| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Devon999
Newbie cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 03 May 2022
Posts: 23
|
 Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 12:47 pm Post subject: CreateThread or not? enable vs disable+restore val? (solved) |
 |
|
I was hoping somebody can help with a big problem I face. What is the method to write this idea? I can only ever get one or the other to work. If enable works, disable doesn't; Aka nothing happens at disable. Alternatively sometimes I got a result where when I enable it, it performs the disable routine and ignores the enable section.
I've tried dozens of variations but would like to start from scratch with most basic way to do this--
| Code: | Enable:
Write a value of 5 to [game.exe+123456]
Disable:
Write a value of 1 to that same exact address from above |
Is create thread even what I should use, or something else for just this?
Like I say upon dozens of tries sometimes I get enable to work but disable won't. Other times enabling it does the disable part but skips the enable part. How to make it do both as expected? I want to start fresh from least amount of code plz so I don't even want to have someone fix mine if that makes sense.
Last edited by Devon999 on Wed May 04, 2022 11:11 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TsTg
Master Cheater
 Reputation: 5
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 334
Location: Somewhere....
|
| Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: |
[ENABLE]
game.exe+123456:
dd 5 //or you can used dq 5 for a 64-bit
[DISABLE]
game.exe+123456:
dd 1
|
this is the most basic code to edit a value in a address, no thread required
if this does not work everytime, it means the pointer/address you use is not static, and probably need to locate a valid one.
Last edited by TsTg on Tue May 03, 2022 12:59 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ParkourPenguin
I post too much
 Reputation: 140
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 4297
|
| Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | [ENABLE]
game.exe+123456:
dd 5
[DISABLE]
game.exe+123456:
dd 1 |
Or Lua:
| Code: | [ENABLE]
{$lua}
if syntaxcheck then return end
writeInteger('game.exe+123456', 5)
{$asm}
[DISABLE]
{$lua}
if syntaxcheck then return end
writeInteger('game.exe+123456', 1)
{$asm}
|
_________________
I don't know where I'm going, but I'll figure it out when I get there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Devon999
Newbie cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 03 May 2022
Posts: 23
|
| Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The short version you both suggested is working great.
Now I have a 2nd one to do and I'm done. But the 2nd one has to store the original value of game.exe+123456 upon enable so it can restore that value upon disable.
Perhaps because I was doing both at once is how I ended up being taken to search results about creat thread. Is this where create thread becomes necessary or can I implement this into the easier code you guys both agreed on above?
Enable:
Save original value
Change value to 5
Disable:
Restore original value |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ParkourPenguin
I post too much
Reputation: 140
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 4297
|
| Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | [ENABLE]
alloc(originalValue, 4)
registerSymbol(originalValue) // needed for readmem in disable
originalValue:
readmem(game.exe+123456, 4)
game.exe+123456:
dd 5
[DISABLE]
game.exe+123456:
readmem(originalValue, 4)
dealloc(originalValue)
unregisterSymbol(originalValue) |
_________________
I don't know where I'm going, but I'll figure it out when I get there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Devon999
Newbie cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 03 May 2022
Posts: 23
|
| Posted: Tue May 03, 2022 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you that works and has solved what was turning into many many hours of struggle.
May I ask? This still doesn't seem like I needed anything I kept running into re:creating threads. I wonder why my searches kept making me think I had to turn to create thread for this? This is way more direct and simple than any of the stuff I kept finding lol
Can you give quick example of when this solution today works vs when I'd need to use create thread instead? After seeing it come up so many times in my searches yesterday and today I feel like I will run into it again. :Shrug: but at any rate thanks for helping me crack this tricky (to me) case today. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
