View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Noobrzor Advanced Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 19 May 2014 Posts: 74
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 5:51 pm Post subject: Cheat Engine utilizing a specific disc drive |
|
|
Hello
Here's my situation. I have an 120GB SSD disc, and a 1TB HDD disc.
On SSD there's my OS (Windows) and things I want to run fast. However I partitoned the 120 gb into Partition 1 which is 36gb for windows, and the rest available is the seocnd partition.
So, CE freezes when trying to process wide-range scans.
Is there a way to make CE utilize HDD disc instead somehow? I checked the settings, but couldn't figure anything out.
Cheers!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dark Byte Site Admin
Reputation: 470
Joined: 09 May 2003 Posts: 25788 Location: The netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
settings->scan settings
tick the option "Don't store the temporary scanfiles in the windows tempdir"
then fill in a path on the other drive
(alternatively, you could change the temp folder in the system environment so other applications know to use a different folder as well)
_________________
Do not ask me about online cheats. I don't know any and wont help finding them.
Like my help? Join me on Patreon so i can keep helping |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Noobrzor Advanced Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 19 May 2014 Posts: 74
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was just about to delete the post, as I also found it.
I am terribly sorry, I am tired and apparently too lazy to read coherent sentences.
Also appreciate the lightning fast response!
Still...change the system environment for other apps? Would that slow things down on SSD, or rather just preserve it's 'health' by not writing some temp/unnecessary stuff onto it?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zanzer I post too much
Reputation: 126
Joined: 09 Jun 2013 Posts: 3278
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
More for the health of the SSD.
Sure, it will cause other applications write to disk slower because it will no longer be a SSD.
Will that slowdown be noticeable? Highly unlikely, as apps shouldn't be reading/writing that much.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
panraven Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 62
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 Posts: 958
|
Posted: Wed Sep 16, 2015 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Noobrzor wrote: | I was just about to delete the post, as I also found it.
I am terribly sorry, I am tired and apparently too lazy to read coherent sentences.
Also appreciate the lightning fast response!
Still...change the system environment for other apps? Would that slow things down on SSD, or rather just preserve it's 'health' by not writing some temp/unnecessary stuff onto it? |
I'm not a pro, but from my understanding, health is not a concern now with the increased SSD and RAM size.
If your SSD still and will have an empty free portion of space like more than 25% or 20G, just ignore its 'health'.
The writing to SSD will be spread out to empty space, and it need 10000sx20G data amount that pass through writing cache
(more likely with low free ram) to totally (and statistically) aging that portion of the SSD,
which is about 20G writing per days for ~3yrs. Still your other 75% of the SSD are still healthy.
If the SDD is used to download movies every day and night, sure it will be much shorter life than it using as temp dir.
Anyway it should sustain till you buy your next cheaper and bigger SSD
In practice HDD is shorter life than SSD not due to read-write limit, but the HDD mechanical/physical (eg.heat) condition.
Move big not frequently access files to HDD, and SSD for frequently access files should be a proper disk management.
_________________
- Retarded. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Noobrzor Advanced Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 19 May 2014 Posts: 74
|
Posted: Thu Sep 17, 2015 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you, panraven.
Yeah, I'd read similar information on the webs, combined with some research that claimed SSDs often exceed their supposed 'lifespan' by several times.
Still, I remember having to deal with heavy temp folder before, and I'd rather keep it 'prolife'.
But I guess you're right. Any way, case closed, thanks again for replies!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|