| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
whisk
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: 22
Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Posts: 590
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:34 pm Post subject: Regarding processors |
 |
|
Would Intel® Core™ i7-640UM Processor(1.20Ghz, 4 Threads, turbo boost up to 2.26GHz, 4M cache)
be better than
Intel Core 2 DUO @ 2.2GHz or AMD Athlon 64
Just a question. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xiGh0stx
Expert Cheater
![]() Reputation: -1
Joined: 20 Dec 2009
Posts: 157
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think the i7 would be better.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phox
I post too much
 Reputation: 110
Joined: 11 Nov 2008
Posts: 2034
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Maybe. There's more than one 2.2 ghz C2D, and certainly more than one Athlon 64. Could you be more specific? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
whisk
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: 22
Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Posts: 590
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Renard wrote: | | Maybe. There's more than one 2.2 ghz C2D, and certainly more than one Athlon 64. Could you be more specific? |
Not really, that's what the site had posted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phox
I post too much
Reputation: 110
Joined: 11 Nov 2008
Posts: 2034
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Whisk wrote: | | Renard wrote: | | Maybe. There's more than one 2.2 ghz C2D, and certainly more than one Athlon 64. Could you be more specific? |
Not really, that's what the site had posted. |
Then you'd best be going to a different site. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
whisk
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: 22
Joined: 04 Oct 2008
Posts: 590
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Renard wrote: | | Whisk wrote: | | Renard wrote: | | Maybe. There's more than one 2.2 ghz C2D, and certainly more than one Athlon 64. Could you be more specific? |
Not really, that's what the site had posted. |
Then you'd best be going to a different site. |
Disregard the second ones then, what do you think about that i7? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phox
I post too much
Reputation: 110
Joined: 11 Nov 2008
Posts: 2034
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 10, 2010 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Whisk wrote: | | Renard wrote: | | Whisk wrote: | | Renard wrote: | | Maybe. There's more than one 2.2 ghz C2D, and certainly more than one Athlon 64. Could you be more specific? |
Not really, that's what the site had posted. |
Then you'd best be going to a different site. |
Disregard the second ones then, what do you think about that i7? |
It's not a good processor for how much it probably costs. Laptop processors in general (particularly i7m's) are no good, since they have such a horrible price/performance ratio. The most value you'll get these days will probably be from something in the Pentium t4000 series. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
