Cheat Engine Forum Index Cheat Engine
The Official Site of Cheat Engine
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Intel Westmere shown running Windows 7

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cheat Engine Forum Index -> Computer Talk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
kls85
I post too much
Reputation: 22

Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 2757
Location: Under ur bed

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:04 pm    Post subject: Intel Westmere shown running Windows 7 Reply with quote

article


For those that has a hard time loading the link

DailyTech wrote:
Intel prepares for its 32nm transition


Intel's P1268 32nm process is at an incredibly advanced stage, and Intel wants the world to know it.

The CPU behemoth has cancelled several 45nm products because it will have much more advanced 32nm products available this year. AMD, meanwhile, has only been selling 45nm chips since November.

Clarkdale is the desktop version of Westmere, built using two 32nm logical cores and a 45nm graphics core using Intel's "Multi-Chip Packaging". Targeted at the mainstream value market, it is capable of running four threads at once with Intel's newest generation of Hyper-Threading. A server variant of Clarkdale is also to be introduced later in Q1 of 2010.

Arrandale is the mobile version of Clarkdale and will also be available with integrated-on-package graphics. It will allow switchable graphics within Windows 7 and Windows Vista, enabling the use of a higher performance GPU through PCIe when plugged in. Both Clarkdale and Arrandale will use 5 series chipsets exclusively with DDR3.

This is the first 32nm silicon out of Intel's Fab D1D Research and Development center in Hillsboro, Oregon. We were told that it is fully functional and running Windows 7. Intel also claims that its cycle times are greatly improved over its P1266 45nm process, and expects a faster ramp.

Power consumption numbers are visible for both Clarkdale and Arrandale, but these are just preliminary. Final production silicon will probably be much lower, but this gives a good indication of Intel's prowess.

We’d like to give a special thanks to Stephen Smith, Vice President and Director of Business Operations of Intel's Digital Enterprise Group, for making these pictures possible.


Last edited by kls85 on Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:20 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nick :3
I posted too much crap
Reputation: 5

Joined: 27 Dec 2007
Posts: 2220

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Are those the CPU's with integrated graphic cards or something? :O
_________________
Ego vos irrumabo et confutuabo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kls85
I post too much
Reputation: 22

Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 2757
Location: Under ur bed

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes that is a integrated gpu right on the processor itself.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sup3R C3r34L
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0

Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Posts: 1379
Location: Soviet Russia

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kls85 wrote:
Yes that is a integrated gpu right on the processor itself.

probably going to make them hot as fuck Confused
most motherboards have built in graphics anyway, I don't see why they've done this... They obviously won't be suitable for proper games and 3D work.

_________________
It's sexy, amirite?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nick :3
I posted too much crap
Reputation: 5

Joined: 27 Dec 2007
Posts: 2220

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sup3r wrote:
kls85 wrote:
Yes that is a integrated gpu right on the processor itself.

probably going to make them hot as fuck Confused
most motherboards have built in graphics anyway, I don't see why they've done this... They obviously won't be suitable for proper games and 3D work.

They would be nice for those small netbooks. I read it wouldnt need the upper half of the mobo or the lower half or something.

_________________
Ego vos irrumabo et confutuabo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Humper
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0

Joined: 06 Jan 2007
Posts: 1545

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes exactly, this is going to be used for cheaper computers such as netbooks and so.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
superweapons
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2

Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 1355
Location: The Internet. Where else?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I doubt Intel will be able to flex Nehalem's architecture enough for it to fit in a 2W TDP cast. It would probably be some 10 times more than that in Arrandale processors. The price would probably be some $80, almost double that of Intel's Atom processor. It's meant to cover for value/mainstream laptops, $600 and up.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rapion124
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0

Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 1095

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, those pictures suck. Funny how the Vice President and Director of Business Operations of Intel's Digital Enterprise Group uses a crappy 1.3 megapixel camera.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Cheetah
I post too much
Reputation: 0

Joined: 11 Nov 2007
Posts: 2758

PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 7:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's for the lower-end market, not performance. As far as heat, I can't see it being too bad on a low clocked chip with a low-end GPU, seeing as from the sound of it it's a single core chip.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cheat Engine Forum Index -> Computer Talk All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

CE Wiki   IRC (#CEF)   Twitter
Third party websites