View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Another human Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 10 Nov 2006 Posts: 413
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:22 pm Post subject: Pondering |
|
|
So I was thinking about this.
Would it be smart to get 2 solid state drives and put them in Raid (0) then just buy 2 hard drives that spin at 10,000 RPM (with high cache, 1.5G) then put those in raid but use the HD in raid mode for your memory storage.
I know I might seem fuzzy.
Long story short:
Use SST in raid
Use HD in raid to store actual memory but use the SST for other stuff.
Do I make sense? and if I do, is it a good idea?
_________________
I support proper grammar! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ajax Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 28 Jan 2008 Posts: 1545
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SSD is like 1/10th of the storage then a regular hard drive that costs about the same. I suggest Raid for hard drives.
_________________
http://forum.cheatengine.org/search.php < The almighty power of this forum =]
Every time someone uses my siggy, a noob dies, and a human being is born.
Drivers are always the answer to everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Another human Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 10 Nov 2006 Posts: 413
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
But wouldn't having 2 SSD in raid and using the actual hard drives for actual storage make things (Data retrieval) faster?
_________________
I support proper grammar! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ajax Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 28 Jan 2008 Posts: 1545
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh I thought you were asking which was the best. Yeah that works pretty good as well too. But I mean, you are saving like 1/5th of a second using SSD and well that whole configuration isn't really worth it. Just go and buy 2 320 GB with 7500 RPM. Works well enough.
_________________
http://forum.cheatengine.org/search.php < The almighty power of this forum =]
Every time someone uses my siggy, a noob dies, and a human being is born.
Drivers are always the answer to everything. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Another human Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 10 Nov 2006 Posts: 413
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Are you SURE the performance gain would not be much greater?
Because I am pretty sure it would. I just have no way of testing my theory.
_________________
I support proper grammar! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Blank I post too much
Reputation: 1
Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 3044
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't see the amount of money needing to be spent on a SSD to be offering a great increase in overall performance.
Personally, I'd stick to the standard HDD. WD Raptors look pretty nice.
I really don't know. Wait for slovach/cheetah/superweapons.
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
hcavolsdsadgadsg I'm a spammer
Reputation: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 5801
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RAID 0 is retarded, hell yes array goes up in flames if a drive decides to fail.
Unless you're into cutting .6 seconds off your DUST 2 load times while increasing risk for drive failure.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cheetah I post too much
Reputation: 0
Joined: 11 Nov 2007 Posts: 2758
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Unless you're doing video capturing or have some specific need for high sustained transfer rates, you'll find RAID is a waste of time.
Now cutting seek times on the other hand will be somewhat beneficial. Going with a single Raptor or an SSD would be a good choice. My advice would be an SSD or two(seeing as they're so small and don't fail mechanically, RAID 0 would be justified.), just for your OS and most used programs. Get a big 7200RPM drive for storage.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|