View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
BrandonMS Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006 Posts: 1175
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:43 am Post subject: Intel Pledges 80 Cores |
|
|
Intel CEO Paul Otellini holds a 300mm wafer with prototype 80-core chips, each of which he said would be able to perform a trillion calculations per second. Note this is about 60 of the 80 Core Processors together.
CEO Paul Otellini held up a silicon wafer with the prototype chips before several thousand attendees at the Intel Developer Forum here Tuesday. The chips are capable of exchanging data at a terabyte a second, Otellini said during a keynote speech. The company hopes to have these chips ready for commercial production within a five-year window.
The ultimate goal, as envisioned by Intel's terascale research prototype, is to enable a trillion floating-point operations per second--a teraflop--on a single chip. Ten years ago, the ASCI Red supercomputer at Sandia National Laboratories became the first supercomputer to deliver 1 teraflop using 4,510 computing nodes.
Intel's prototype uses 80 floating-point cores, each running at 3.16GHz, Justin Rattner, Intel's chief technology officer, said in a speech following Otellini's address. In order to move data in between individual cores and into memory, the company plans to use an on-chip interconnect fabric and stacked SRAM (static RAM) chips attached directly to the bottom of the chip, he said.
Intel's work on silicon photonics, including its recent announcement of a silicon laser, could help contribute toward the core-to-core connection challenge. Rattner and professor John Bowers of the University of California at Santa Barbara demonstrated Intel's newest breakthrough model of silicon laser, which was constructed using conventional techniques that are better suited to volume manufacturing than older iterations of the laser.
Many of the architectural nuances of the 80-core chip can be traced back to earlier research breakthroughs announced at previous IDFs. Connecting chips directly to each other through tiny wires is called Through Silicon Vias, which Intel discussed in 2005. TSV will give the chip an aggregate memory bandwidth of 1 terabyte per second.
Intel, meanwhile, began to discuss replacing wires with optical technology in computers and chips in 2001 and has come out with several experimental parts for enabling lasers and optical technology to replace wires.
The same year, Intel began to warn about the dangers of heat dissipation in processors. One of the solutions, the company said at the time, lay in producing chips with multiple cores.
Credits: CNET
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Will Smith Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 565
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Holy shit thats fast.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BrandonMS Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006 Posts: 1175
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
If you do the calculations...
3.16GHz*80=252.8GHz
Overclocked?
5.00GHz*80=400GHz
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Losplagos Expert Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 21 Mar 2006 Posts: 172 Location: Knee deep in a c++ book
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
~insert nerdgasm~ And to the poster above me you never know by the time this is commercially avaible at a reasonable price the cooling on chips will probably be much better.
_________________
Earthbound = 31337 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BrandonMS Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006 Posts: 1175
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Losplagos wrote: | ~insert nerdgasm~ And to the poster above me you never know by the time this is commercially avaible at a reasonable price the cooling on chips will probably be much better. |
Currently the CPU he is using uses 65w of power. A little bit more than a household lightbulb. Todays watercoolers could cool this down.
And it will be available by 2011.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Madman I post too much
Reputation: 1
Joined: 04 May 2006 Posts: 3978
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'd like to see a program that supports 80 cores.
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xDev Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 7
Joined: 05 Feb 2007 Posts: 971
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Madman wrote: | I'd like to see a program that supports 80 cores.  |
Just imagine running MapleStory on 80 Cores? LOL
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sm4rtOne Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006 Posts: 340
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
MapleStory on 80 Cores....That would be stupid. At first when I saw that picture, i was like Wtf it's huge! We're gonna need a PetaAtx Board
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
UnLmtD Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 894 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
BrandonMS wrote: | If you do the calculations...
3.16GHz*80=252.8GHz
Overclocked?
5.00GHz*80=400GHz |
Unfortunately that's not the way things work. You can't add Ghz like that.
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
deserthunder Expert Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 04 Jul 2007 Posts: 192 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 9:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
*He drops it, Shit!* Lol wouldn't that cost wayy too much even if they did release it?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Losplagos Expert Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 21 Mar 2006 Posts: 172 Location: Knee deep in a c++ book
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
BrandonMs wrote: | will be available by 2011. |
I wrote: | by the time this is commercially avaible at a reasonable price the cooling on chips will probably be much better. |
"At a reasonable price." Since a quadcore processor at around 3.0ghz can cost up too $2600 or so. Eighty core processor unless they really find a way to produce it cheaper will be so expensive that it will not be pratical unless your a giant company running servers. Even then if i remember correctly the crappy vista only supports up too 8 cores. And most applications would have to be completely rewritten to support 80 cores when alot of them are just working on supporting 2 cores. And if your xp does'nt have the hotfix it wont even fully support multicores.
_________________
Earthbound = 31337 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
UnLmtD Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 13 Mar 2007 Posts: 894 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Losplagos wrote: | BrandonMs wrote: | will be available by 2011. |
Me wrote: | by the time this is commercially avaible at a reasonable price the cooling on chips will probably be much better. |
Since a quadcore processor at around 3.0ghz can cost up too $2600 or so. |
No. Not at all. A QX9650 which is a quad processor clocked at 3GHz, will cost you around 1000$ where I live.
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cheetah I post too much
Reputation: 0
Joined: 11 Nov 2007 Posts: 2758
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
UnLmtD wrote: | BrandonMS wrote: | If you do the calculations...
3.16GHz*80=252.8GHz
Overclocked?
5.00GHz*80=400GHz |
Unfortunately that's not the way things work. You can't add Ghz like that. |
You beat me to it. It's a 3.16GHz chip no matter how many cores it has.
Anyway, you guys have to realize this isn't an x86 chip so it's not like you can pop it into your computer and install Windows on it, it's meant for specialized supercomputing applications. Also, at 65w it only puts out as much heat as a low-end Core 2 Duo so air cooling would do just fine.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Flyte Peanuts!!!!
Reputation: 6
Joined: 19 Apr 2006 Posts: 1887 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
xdeviance wrote: | Madman wrote: | I'd like to see a program that supports 80 cores.  |
Just imagine running MapleStory on 80 Cores? LOL |
I can hear it now: LOLZ, can youz hepl mi disabble 79 cores soz i can uze MLE?!?!?!
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BrandonMS Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 30 Nov 2006 Posts: 1175
|
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
deserthunder wrote: | *He drops it, Shit!* Lol wouldn't that cost wayy too much even if they did release it? |
If you told somebody 4 years ago that they're making a quad core CPU, they would have said the same thing.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|