 |
Cheat Engine The Official Site of Cheat Engine
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
redslothx Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 13
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 1949
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Up2Admin wrote: | @Ozymandias
You misunderstand art and therefor don't belong here unless you figure it out. Abstract can be... anything. You could take a square and call it "dick", because it reminds you of your dick. It's up to the artist.
I think the name fits well. |
I know what abstract is, and any artists who creates a piece and names it, does so for the purpose of describing the art piece. The names given to the piece are related to the piece itself in some form.
When it comes to abstract in particular, the name is one of the most important tools that the viewer has for identifying or at least understanding what is occuring.
Without giving a name or obvious hint at what you've done, the viewer is left looking at a colorful canvas. When a name is given, the viewer tries to see why the artist named that piece and so he looks for its purpose. If a name wasn't given, then it is left to the imagination of the person to come up with an opinionated answer at what they see. (Also the basis of the Rorschach tests) (No name? Then you tell me what you are seeing.) Instead of giving insight into the artists mind, you gain insight into the mind of viewer.
Now if you add a name to a piece, you are telling the viewer to search for that. In this case, there's not a trace of anything related to painkillers.
Going back to what i said about the piece being related to the name in some form:
-at least in your example of calling something "Dick", the viewer might recognize the square for being a short and thick dick or they could see a square face with no features of a guy that could be called Dick. Either way, they are given something to look at which they could recognize because of the name.
Edit:
Or like ~Pi-nipple! said, you could draw a dick and call it Ozymandias. It could be either understood as a penis with a name, it could be understood symbolically as meaning that Ozymandias is a dick, or a mixture of that and other things. Point is, its describing something.
Thnx ~Pi-nipple!, you're helping me here =0
_________________
Last edited by redslothx on Sat Sep 12, 2009 4:23 am; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sponge cake recipe Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 22
Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 1635
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ~Pi-nipple! wrote: | | Up2Admin wrote: | @Ozymandias
You misunderstand art and therefor don't belong here unless you figure it out. Abstract can be... anything. You could take a square and call it "dick", because it reminds you of your dick. It's up to the artist.
I think the name fits well. |
..or you could draw a Dick and call it "Ozymandias", either way its a definate profit. |
Best response ever.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kronos Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 15 Dec 2008 Posts: 1606 Location: wtf
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Could use some more depth but overall looks nice.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sponge cake recipe Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 22
Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 1635
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Added V2 & V3.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kronos Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 15 Dec 2008 Posts: 1606 Location: wtf
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well dunno meh.. i like the v1 better, others are bit messy imo.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
redslothx Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 13
Joined: 27 Nov 2006 Posts: 1949
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 11:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
V1 looks "calmer"
others are too distracting.
=0
either way, they're good o.o
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
educofu Expert Cheater
Reputation: 3
Joined: 21 Aug 2009 Posts: 171 Location: Brazil,MG,OP
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ozymandias wrote: | | konr wrote: | | Ozymandias wrote: | | konr wrote: | | Ozymandias wrote: | | konr wrote: | | Ozymandias wrote: | | konr wrote: | | Ozymandias wrote: | | Viral wrote: | | Ozymandias wrote: | | i don't see how "Painkiller" name applies to this, and i see no traces of depth. |
Based off the colour-scheme, and it's just a name anyway.
Also, I admitted it had fail depth, no need to point that out unless you're gonna give a suggestion on how to fix it. |
what were you even trying to do? >_>
its kind of impossible to add depth to this unless you describe it or say what you were trying to accomplish here. And since you named it, that's the automatic description. In this case, it has nothing to do with Painkillers, so tell us what we're supposed to be looking at and we might be able to help. | I called my my little pony tag 'Death and Destruction'. What're you gonna do? |
i agree, introducing my little pony to kids can have chaotic results =/ | I asked you a question. What're you going to do about it? Be childish and pretend to agree with such an outrageous 'automatic description' or admit that a name is not the description? |
read edit | Hey redslothx, do you know what abstract is? Guess not. |
Not sloth.
But yeah I know what abstract is.
Either way, abstract pieces have names that resemble the actual art.
what now? | Just because you've seen a few that do have names that resemble the pieces them selves, that doesn't mean that they have to. |
When a piece of art is named, the name describe the art.
bye now =0 |
...
thats art.
_________________
"I finally started thinking outside of the box, only to find myself in a larger box." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
:^) Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 37
Joined: 30 Jun 2008 Posts: 1062
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm more toward V3. It's more appealing to the depth.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
To0k' Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 29 Jul 2009 Posts: 921
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wtf rsx, Why taking that what they say to you? -.-
rsx is a better artist then all of you together
fuckers.
As for the sig, the name makes no sense. You give a sig a name because you can actually see something in it, not because you want to give it a name.
also, abstract is nothing. just random crap, though it can look good sometime, this one doesn't.
V1 is better btw, calmer what rsx said.
kthnx
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Daniel. I post too much
Reputation: 72
Joined: 08 Nov 2007 Posts: 2938
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
viral how do u make these?
its really cool
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Batman Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 26 Jan 2008 Posts: 956
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 2:20 pm Post subject: Re: Painkiller |
|
|
| Viral wrote: | Fail depth.
This is the one without the attempt to give it depth, I failed miserably.
V2:
V3:
 |
Lawl, I like it.
It makes me feel, mellow.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
~Pineapple! Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 27 Dec 2008 Posts: 1810 Location: The Local Library :3
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ozymandias wrote: | | Up2Admin wrote: | @Ozymandias
You misunderstand art and therefor don't belong here unless you figure it out. Abstract can be... anything. You could take a square and call it "dick", because it reminds you of your dick. It's up to the artist.
I think the name fits well. |
I know what abstract is, and any artists who creates a piece and names it, does so for the purpose of describing the art piece. The names given to the piece are related to the piece itself in some form.
When it comes to abstract in particular, the name is one of the most important tools that the viewer has for identifying or at least understanding what is occuring.
Without giving a name or obvious hint at what you've done, the viewer is left looking at a colorful canvas. When a name is given, the viewer tries to see why the artist named that piece and so he looks for its purpose. If a name wasn't given, then it is left to the imagination of the person to come up with an opinionated answer at what they see. (Also the basis of the Rorschach tests) (No name? Then you tell me what you are seeing.) Instead of giving insight into the artists mind, you gain insight into the mind of viewer.
Now if you add a name to a piece, you are telling the viewer to search for that. In this case, there's not a trace of anything related to painkillers.
Going back to what i said about the piece being related to the name in some form:
-at least in your example of calling something "Dick", the viewer might recognize the square for being a short and thick dick or they could see a square face with no features of a guy that could be called Dick. Either way, they are given something to look at which they could recognize because of the name.
Edit:
Or like ~Pi-nipple! said, you could draw a dick and call it Ozymandias. It could be either understood as a penis with a name, it could be understood symbolically as meaning that Ozymandias is a dick, or a mixture of that and other things. Point is, its describing something.
Thnx ~Pi-nipple!, you're helping me here =0 |
I apoligise
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oblivious Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 45
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 1732
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| To0k' wrote: | Wtf rsx, Why taking that what they say to you? -.-
rsx is a better artist then all of you together
fuckers.
As for the sig, the name makes no sense. You give a sig a name because you can actually see something in it, not because you want to give it a name.
also, abstract is nothing. just random crap, though it can look good sometime, this one doesn't.
V1 is better btw, calmer what rsx said.
kthnx |
OH YEAH BECAUSE IF YOU LIKE ART BETTER, IS FACT, NOT OPINION.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sponge cake recipe Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 22
Joined: 24 Sep 2007 Posts: 1635
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| To0k' wrote: | | also, abstract is nothing. just random crap, though it can look good sometime, this one doesn't. |
Wow.
Just wow.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Up2Admin I'm a spammer
Reputation: 126
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 6548 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| To0k' wrote: | Wtf rsx, Why taking that what they say to you? -.-
rsx is a better artist then all of you together
fuckers.
As for the sig, the name makes no sense. You give a sig a name because you can actually see something in it, not because you want to give it a name.
also, abstract is nothing. just random crap, though it can look good sometime, this one doesn't.
V1 is better btw, calmer what rsx said.
kthnx | You don't understand art either, please leave.
If the colors remind the artist about painkillers then he can, by all means, name it "painkillers". There's nothing wrong with that, that's how 99% of abstract artists name their work.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|