 |
Cheat Engine The Official Site of Cheat Engine
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Channel GannoK pffrt
Reputation: 129
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 610
|
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:11 pm Post subject: NSA releases their decompiling software Ghidra |
|
|
https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/ghidra
Dont know if you guys have seen this already but it's pretty neato.
Written in java so you need the sdk to run it
_________________
Channel GannoK wrote: | I'm openly challenging talix to hand to hand combat, broadcasted on instagram for the world to see. Sponsored by the Kyle Gannon Show.
If he declines this offer, he is not a man. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
br0l0ck Cheater
Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2019 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
its illegal to reverse engineer software
honey pot. dont use.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Channel GannoK pffrt
Reputation: 129
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 610
|
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2019 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Brolock wrote: | its illegal to reverse engineer software
honey pot. dont use. |
It's meant for decompiling malware and potentially harmful files, I imagine this is not, unless there's some cleverly crafted steganography in their files. it's all open source though and available in plain text, I highly doubt it's as much of a threat and trap as you claim it is.
if you're a dumbass and you go around using this on consumer level programs, or anything with any sort of agreement, then yea, you'll probably find yourself with a lot of trouble on your hands.
_________________
Channel GannoK wrote: | I'm openly challenging talix to hand to hand combat, broadcasted on instagram for the world to see. Sponsored by the Kyle Gannon Show.
If he declines this offer, he is not a man. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dark Byte Site Admin
Reputation: 467
Joined: 09 May 2003 Posts: 25706 Location: The netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2019 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
depends on where you live.
If you live in a free country(so not the usa) you can just decompile whatever you like
_________________
Do not ask me about online cheats. I don't know any and wont help finding them.
Like my help? Join me on Patreon so i can keep helping |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Mania Guy I post too much
Reputation: 10
Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 2529 Location: Up
|
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2019 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
NSA? No thanks fam
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
br0l0ck Cheater
Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2019 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Channel GannoK wrote: | Brolock wrote: | its illegal to reverse engineer software
honey pot. dont use. |
It's meant for decompiling malware and potentially harmful files, I imagine this is not, unless there's some cleverly crafted steganography in their files. it's all open source though and available in plain text, I highly doubt it's as much of a threat and trap as you claim it is.
if you're a dumbass and you go around using this on consumer level programs, or anything with any sort of agreement, then yea, you'll probably find yourself with a lot of trouble on your hands. | malware and potentially harmful files that the NSA creates/buys and uses themselves
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2013/08/31/the-nsa-hacks-other-countries-by-buying-millions-of-dollars-worth-of-computer-vulnerabilities/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.74da8ce18e28
you seriously have to question why the NSA, one of the biggest users of malware and spying tools, would want to put into the hands of the public a way to learn about and prevent the spread of the very things they are using
the legality of reverse engineering software is a total gray area, and if you get sent a National security letter, youre 100% fucked
@darkbyte
https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2015/7/188738-anti-circumvention-rules-limit-reverse-engineering/abstract
if any copyright or prevention measures are in place, chances are you will be breaking the law in any western country. sure youre fine in shitholes like Russia or SEA.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Channel GannoK pffrt
Reputation: 129
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 610
|
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Brolock wrote: | Channel GannoK wrote: | Brolock wrote: | its illegal to reverse engineer software
honey pot. dont use. |
It's meant for decompiling malware and potentially harmful files, I imagine this is not, unless there's some cleverly crafted steganography in their files. it's all open source though and available in plain text, I highly doubt it's as much of a threat and trap as you claim it is.
if you're a dumbass and you go around using this on consumer level programs, or anything with any sort of agreement, then yea, you'll probably find yourself with a lot of trouble on your hands. | malware and potentially harmful files that the NSA creates/buys and uses themselves
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2013/08/31/the-nsa-hacks-other-countries-by-buying-millions-of-dollars-worth-of-computer-vulnerabilities/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.74da8ce18e28
you seriously have to question why the NSA, one of the biggest users of malware and spying tools, would want to put into the hands of the public a way to learn about and prevent the spread of the very things they are using
the legality of reverse engineering software is a total gray area, and if you get sent a National security letter, youre 100% fucked
@darkbyte
https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2015/7/188738-anti-circumvention-rules-limit-reverse-engineering/abstract
if any copyright or prevention measures are in place, chances are you will be breaking the law in any western country. sure youre fine in shitholes like Russia or SEA. |
it was in the wikileaks in 2017.
Source code already existed, they decided to just release it. while yes, they have made/sold viruses. this is nothing more than open source software. also if you have your CEH you basically allowed to do damn near anything you want, as long as no real damages are done.
I've already seen people use this to make game hacks tho, i imagine this is going to be a huge issue for game companies.
_________________
Channel GannoK wrote: | I'm openly challenging talix to hand to hand combat, broadcasted on instagram for the world to see. Sponsored by the Kyle Gannon Show.
If he declines this offer, he is not a man. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
br0l0ck Cheater
Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2019 5:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bad people are going to use it and then they will make the law more strict against reverse engineering by saying something like "See, we cant trust the people to use it for good!".
there's far more blackhats than CEHs
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HotHeap !BEWARE! Deletes post on answer
Reputation: 2
Joined: 06 Oct 2018 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
its just ida LMFAO
Shrooms says OP is a retard, which from this post is true
Ghidra is seen by many security researchers as a competitor IDA Pro.
This takes half an hour to dissamble a 64 bit game
Ida pro takes 5 min
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Channel GannoK pffrt
Reputation: 129
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 610
|
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
GhostMane wrote: | its just ida LMFAO
Shrooms says OP is a retard, which from this post is true
Ghidra is seen by many security researchers as a competitor IDA Pro.
This takes half an hour to dissamble a 64 bit game
Ida pro takes 5 min |
who are these security researchers? You?
have you actually compared the code yourself? No you haven't because IDA isn't open source, and that's what is making Ghidra the hot topic, because I imagine in a few months from now there is going to be a new version out that is much more optimized, possibly even new features.
It sounds like to me you're writing this off. Like a moron that doesn't have a mind of his own and regurgitates every opinion he sees on the internet
_________________
Channel GannoK wrote: | I'm openly challenging talix to hand to hand combat, broadcasted on instagram for the world to see. Sponsored by the Kyle Gannon Show.
If he declines this offer, he is not a man. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
br0l0ck Cheater
Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
the govt doesnt release free shit for no reason
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(anonymity_network)#History
this is probably another honeypot just like tor
the NSA has so much more resources than IDA, so if thats their competition then there's a reason why NSA software is slower. its probably doing a lot of extra shit.
"unless there's some cleverly crafted steganography in their files. it's all open source though and available in plain text, I highly doubt it's as much of a threat and trap as you claim it is. "
I wouldnt doubt that this is exactly whats going on. why isnt it up on github yet, what exactly do they need to prep to just push to it?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Channel GannoK pffrt
Reputation: 129
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 610
|
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Brolock wrote: | the govt doesnt release free shit for no reason
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_(anonymity_network)#History
this is probably another honeypot just like tor
the NSA has so much more resources than IDA, so if thats their competition then there's a reason why NSA software is slower. its probably doing a lot of extra shit.
"unless there's some cleverly crafted steganography in their files. it's all open source though and available in plain text, I highly doubt it's as much of a threat and trap as you claim it is. "
I wouldnt doubt that this is exactly whats going on. why isnt it up on github yet, what exactly do they need to prep to just push to it? |
I quote from their website
"NSA will be making Ghidra available to the public as an open source release in time for its first public demonstration at the 2019 RSA Conference this March. "
_________________
Channel GannoK wrote: | I'm openly challenging talix to hand to hand combat, broadcasted on instagram for the world to see. Sponsored by the Kyle Gannon Show.
If he declines this offer, he is not a man. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cryoma Member of the Year
Reputation: 198
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 1819
|
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
denuvo btfo
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Channel GannoK pffrt
Reputation: 129
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 610
|
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Also Brolock since you mentioned TOR and are trying to relate the two,
the main difference in these two pieces of technology is that one is functionally only affecting programming, and the other is network topology and protocol, while they may both encompass some items and subjects in one or more of the same layers of the OSI model, their primary functions work way differently to be able to say that the amount skepticism that went and goes into TOR (I know I don't trust TOR, single digit amounts of layer keyed encryption methods are not going to be enough, especially with quantum computing coming soon) should also go into Ghidra.
Maybe this version that's publicly released online of Ghidra is bugged, yes that's very possible, as with any program no doubt.
I think we should be going into this discovery of the method of unscrambling highly encrypted math problems(which is what code and programming is, if not physics of life) and basically seeing this as a step forward in more advanced programming/AI. It's public release and announcement is as important if not more important than, say, calculus(AP amirite).
That said, if you have a completely offline computer that is encrypted, no one can possible know you're even running the software, unless you're an idiot of course.
Imagine a walking AI soldier with all kinds of laser weapons and Wireless transmitters and blockers(among other weaponry of course), there is nothing preventing a walking EMP that affects Military and targets exclusively that are viewed as threats to the government. It starts with stuff programs like CE, IDA and Ghidra, because you can make a program that utilizes these core functions and create a walking master device that controls everything that isn't secure enough lol. It's just a matter of time before the government or someone else starts rolling them out, watch.
The government is developing Magitek suits :^)
_________________
Channel GannoK wrote: | I'm openly challenging talix to hand to hand combat, broadcasted on instagram for the world to see. Sponsored by the Kyle Gannon Show.
If he declines this offer, he is not a man. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
br0l0ck Cheater
Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
damn dude you sure used a lot of tech words to make yourself sound fuckin smart.
the only relation I was making between the two was that they were both developed by the government. I used the term honeypot for a reason, the govt needed the general population to use TOR because it wouldnt even make sense if they were the only ones using it, because then you would know exactly who the fucking feds were (the only ones to use tor). this is my analogy, that the reason they are releasing this is a similar reason, maybe not to bug people, the nsa does a lot more than just that, but because they need a mass amount of people to do this for some reason.
now to tackle the second half of your spiel: a compiled binary program isn't relatable to a "unscrambling highly encrypted math problem". you have two things youre trying to say that arent the same thing:
1) you arent getting source code back when reverse engineering a binary, you're getting back things like how the logic of the program worked, what the call flow looks like, etc. youre not really "unscrambling" it.
2)highly encrypted math problem doesnt make sense. the encryption IS a math problem. youre using a formula and secret keys so that it is practically impossible to factor the number back into the key.
"completely offline computer..." this doesnt matter. this is called an air gap, and it doesnt mean youre secure. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet
"that is encrypted" what do you mean by encrypting a computer?
"imagine a walking AI soldier..." warfare will never be done this way, we have drones and shit, the entire thing just sounds so fucking impractical. do you seriously fucking believe were going to have anthropomorphic robot soliders walking around reverse engineering enemy shit when most of the US "enenmies" are shitholes that we abuse for oil and collude with.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|