Cheat Engine

Varstal · Newbie cheater Reputation: 0 Joined: 14 Jun 2014 Posts: 20

So originally I was using the register at the health address and that worked for a while, but I was having an issue that on some boots the register I was using was changing so I decided to go back to looking into data dissection and find a static offset (which I found). I altered the code to cmp the offset instead of what I was using before. Thankfully, Methos++ showed me how to use an offset that is under a pointer so this is what I currently have:

[ENABLE]

alloc(newmem,2048)
label(returnhere)
label(exit)
label(aob)
label(zombie)
label(friendly)
registersymbol(aob)
aobscan(aob1,F3 0F10 40 24 F3 0F 5A C0 F2 44 0F5A F8 F3 44 0F11 3C 24)

newmem:
push ebx
mov ebx,[rax+70]
mov ebx,[ebx+70]
cmp ebx,(float)1
pop ebx
je friendly
jmp zombie

friendly:
mov [rax+24],(float)100.0
movss xmm0,[rax+24]
jmp returnhere

zombie:
movss xmm0,[rax+24]
jmp returnhere

exit:
jmp returnhere

aob1:
aob:
jmp newmem
returnhere:

[DISABLE]
dealloc(newmem)
aob:
db F3 0F 10 40 24
unregistersymbol(aob)

The issue that I'm having is that I load the code and within 30 seconds.

++METHOS · Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2014 1:12 pm Post subject:

Probably because your offset is no good. You need to compare as many structures as you can to ensure that your pointer tree is reliable. If you see ?? in any of the structures at that pointer location, the game will crash when trying to compare what the value is at that location. Either try a different pointer tree, and/or inject at a different instruction that ONLY accesses health addresses.

Varstal · Newbie cheater Reputation: 0 Joined: 14 Jun 2014 Posts: 20

ok, but other than that it looks good?

++METHOS · Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2014 2:30 pm Post subject:

Looks okay to me.