View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
br0l0ck Cheater
Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kosma. wrote: | Cryoma wrote: | Then why tv's with 600fps? |
why does flac exist when you can't hear the difference between it and 320kbps mp3s? | because mp3 degrade over time, flac does not because it is uncompressed, and lasts much much longer, so for archive purposes flac is obviously better |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
elpacco Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 30
Joined: 16 Oct 2007 Posts: 1267
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Brolock wrote: | Kosma. wrote: | Cryoma wrote: | Then why tv's with 600fps? |
why does flac exist when you can't hear the difference between it and 320kbps mp3s? | because mp3 degrade over time, flac does not because it is uncompressed, and lasts much much longer, so for archive purposes flac is obviously better | You're not being serious, are you? Rotational velocidensity isn't real, in case you were. _________________
[AM]Misery wrote: |
FangBanger wrote: | What is the best way for a lv19 Soldier to solo Sledge on Borderlands? | Shoot him. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cryoma Member of the Year
Reputation: 198
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 1819
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 8:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
elpacco wrote: | Brolock wrote: | Kosma. wrote: | Cryoma wrote: | Then why tv's with 600fps? |
why does flac exist when you can't hear the difference between it and 320kbps mp3s? | because mp3 degrade over time, flac does not because it is uncompressed, and lasts much much longer, so for archive purposes flac is obviously better | You're not being serious, are you? Rotational velocidensity isn't real, in case you were. |
Yes it is, but it affects everything, compressed or otherwise, and at a much slower rate (unnoticeable in the human lifespan) than made out to be. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the the the Master Cheater
Reputation: 46
Joined: 15 Jun 2008 Posts: 429
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Phox wrote: | GannoK wrote: | I call bullshit on whatever that article says because I def tell a difference past fucking 15 | Maybe, apparently the theory is that your eyes only take in 15 images per second.
My eyes could have fooled me. | no. your eyes don't work with frames, they have some weird continuous light receiving method.
[source] (which most of you omit) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kavvman Master Cheater
Reputation: 2
Joined: 17 Apr 2004 Posts: 316
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|