Cheat Engine :: View topic

Cheat Engine
The Official Site of Cheat Engine

FAQ

Memberlist

Usergroups

Profile

Cross Marian
Goto page 1, 2 Next

Cheat Engine Forum Index -> Art

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

w1nd1n6s
Advanced Cheater

Reputation: 2

Joined: 22 Sep 2009
Posts: 51

Posted: Wed May 12, 2010 2:35 pm Post subject: Cross Marian

CnC

Farr.
Grandmaster Cheater

Reputation: 0

Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 749

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 9:45 pm Post subject:

Is this is the same thing as before? We can't really give CnC if all you keep doing is putting your name on someone else's image

1929394839292057839194958
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme

Reputation: 130

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1509

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 9:51 pm Post subject:

Farr. wrote:

Is this is the same thing as before?
We can't really give CnC if all you keep doing is putting your name on someone else's image

There are clearly C4Ds on there, and edited lighting and stuff. Sure, it's terrible, but it isn't what you keep repeating.

Farr.
Grandmaster Cheater

Reputation: 0

Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 749

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 11:16 pm Post subject:

to me it's just not keeping the spirit of it. Sure he adds some lighting and over sharpens and makes his name with the fanciest font he can find, but anybody could do that. A signature actually shows someone's work and effort.

1929394839292057839194958
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme

Reputation: 130

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1509

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 11:17 pm Post subject:

Farr. wrote:

to me it's just not keeping the spirit of it. Sure he adds some lighting and over sharpens and makes his name with the fanciest font he can find, but anybody could do that. A signature actually shows someone's work and effort.

Doesn't matter how bad it is, you're still being retarded in what you just said.

Farr.
Grandmaster Cheater

Reputation: 0

Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 749

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 11:33 pm Post subject:

konr wrote:

Farr. wrote:

Doesn't matter how bad it is, you're still being retarded in what you just said.

Nope I don't think so. It's what I meant to say, if you don't understand it then that's fine. No reason to go around calling people retarded, although I know it makes you feel better and makes you feel like you're smarter

1929394839292057839194958
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme

Reputation: 130

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1509

Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 12:15 am Post subject:

Farr. wrote:

konr wrote:

Farr. wrote:

Doesn't matter how bad it is, you're still being retarded in what you just said.

If I'm smart, it's in this subject. He added a C4D, changed a few things and added text. Sure, it's a bad signature, but he didn't just get someone's picture and add his name to it. Don't be so dense.

Farr.
Grandmaster Cheater

Reputation: 0

Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 749

Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 5:44 am Post subject:

konr wrote:

Farr. wrote:

konr wrote:

Farr. wrote:

Doesn't matter how bad it is, you're still being retarded in what you just said.

That sounds like an opinion to me, again, no reason to call someone stupid because they don't see it the way you do.

Stylised
Grandmaster Cheater

Reputation: 20

Joined: 04 Nov 2008
Posts: 712

Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 6:02 am Post subject:

You are wrong Farr. I don't wanna go into depth but If you change anything in something it makes it yours. Unless of course you rub out his name and put in yours.

Farr.
Grandmaster Cheater

Reputation: 0

Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 749

Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 1:45 pm Post subject:

In my opinion, it's still plagiarism even if he did slightly change it. But I can see we all have a difference of opinion so I won't talk about it or mention this again

Farr.
Grandmaster Cheater

Reputation: 0

Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 749

Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 5:43 pm Post subject:

Queenston wrote:

Farr. wrote:

In my opinion, it's still plagiarism even if he did slightly change it.
But I can see we all have a difference of opinion so I won't talk about it or mention this again

Ripped because he used a picture of Samus and edited it.

No I don't think so. He only used a stock image and the majority of the sig is edited.
But if that's your opinion, than I can't prove you wrong

1929394839292057839194958
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme

Reputation: 130

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1509

Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 6:01 pm Post subject:

Farr. wrote:

In my opinion, it's still plagiarism even if he did slightly change it.
But I can see we all have a difference of opinion so I won't talk about it or mention this again

How long have you been making signatures at popular signature critique sites? That's right, you haven't. How long have I been doing it? Oh, just about 5 years.

Farr.
Grandmaster Cheater

Reputation: 0

Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 749

Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 6:38 pm Post subject:

konr wrote:

Farr. wrote:

In my opinion, it's still plagiarism even if he did slightly change it.
But I can see we all have a difference of opinion so I won't talk about it or mention this again

How long have you been making signatures at popular signature critique sites? That's right, you haven't. How long have I been doing it? Oh, just about 5 years.

Oh my bad man,I'm very impressed, I shouldn't have stepped out of line like that. How dare I make any kind of critique when you're obviously the expert here. I'm so sorry for giving my opinion on a piece of artwork. I promise I won't do it again until I consult you first Konr.
I'm sure if I work that hard for 5 years I'll maybe be able to develop some kind of real opinion

Farr.
Grandmaster Cheater

Reputation: 0

Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 749

Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 7:05 pm Post subject:

Queenston wrote:

Farr. wrote:

konr wrote:

Farr. wrote:

In my opinion, it's still plagiarism even if he did slightly change it.
But I can see we all have a difference of opinion so I won't talk about it or mention this again

How long have you been making signatures at popular signature critique sites? That's right, you haven't. How long have I been doing it? Oh, just about 5 years.

Yes.

Great, now I just hope Konr can forgive me for being such a douche and for almost insulting him. I can't believe I almost did that. I feel so stupid. In fact, even attempting to argue with someone so logical and intelligent was a bad idea, right from the start.
Someone with oh I don't know.. 5 years of experience in art critique obviously has a more superior opinion, it's not like mine even matters. I'm thankful Konr took notice and even the time to correct me

Daniel.
I post too much

Reputation: 72

Joined: 08 Nov 2007
Posts: 2938

Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 7:16 pm Post subject:

Farr. wrote:

Queenston wrote:

Farr. wrote:

In my opinion, it's still plagiarism even if he did slightly change it.
But I can see we all have a difference of opinion so I won't talk about it or mention this again

Ripped because he used a picture of Samus and edited it.

No I don't think so. He only used a stock image and the majority of the sig is edited.
But if that's your opinion, than I can't prove you wrong

no stock used there, he used a render...
_________________

Display posts from previous:

	Cheat Engine Forum Index -> Art	All times are GMT - 6 Hours Goto page 1, 2 Next
Page 1 of 2

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum