View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
CrimsonReaper How do I cheat?
Reputation: 0
Joined: 09 May 2009 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:09 am Post subject: Windows OS's |
|
|
anyone ever notice its really always the second OS released by microsoft that is good/okay/working?
1- NT 3.51
2- Windows 95
3- NT 4.0
4- Windows 98
5- Windows 98 SE (Fails because it took 11 months and wasn't really much of a difference)
6- Windows 2000
7- Windows ME
8- Windows XP
9- Windows Vista
10- Windows 7
*decided not to include server OS's or variations (x32,x64)
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
To0k How do I cheat?
Reputation: 14
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 Posts: 0
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's because when they make a new OS all bug's and errors will be fixed in the next version.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Trow Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 2
Joined: 17 Aug 2006 Posts: 957
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:32 am Post subject: Re: Windows OS's |
|
|
CrimsonReaper wrote: | anyone ever notice its really always the second OS released by microsoft that is good/okay/working? |
and by that do you mean vista doesn't work?
_________________
Get kidnapped often. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Anon. Master Cheater
Reputation: 1
Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Posts: 266
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Vista isnt bad after you turn some stuff off and disable some other stuff.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
NINTENDO Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 02 Nov 2007 Posts: 1371
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anon. wrote: | Vista isnt bad after you turn some stuff off and disable some other stuff. |
win7 has what vista has. It's not any better.
_________________
Intel over amd yes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Burningmace Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 5
Joined: 17 Feb 2008 Posts: 520 Location: Inside the Intel CET shadow stack
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Windows ME was a disaster.
Didn't they try to make an OS that was half in the DOS world and half in the NT world?
_________________
It's not fun unless every exploit mitigation is enabled. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kls85 I post too much
Reputation: 22
Joined: 18 Jul 2008 Posts: 2757 Location: Under ur bed
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Funny thing is my very first machine (build myself) was installed with ME and I had no problems what's so ever.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Burningmace Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 5
Joined: 17 Feb 2008 Posts: 520 Location: Inside the Intel CET shadow stack
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I had it installed for about a week and it crashed on me regularly. I reverted to Windows 2000 pretty much straight away.
_________________
It's not fun unless every exploit mitigation is enabled. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kls85 I post too much
Reputation: 22
Joined: 18 Jul 2008 Posts: 2757 Location: Under ur bed
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Windows ME was MS celebration for the new Millennium and Win2K is not part of a desktop OS. It's the successor to NT 4.0.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
gogodr I post too much
Reputation: 125
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 2041
|
Posted: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Windows MsDOS was flawless when it was released
because it released as an upgrade of DOS (( that isnt really from Microsoft ))
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|