View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
countrycone Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 282
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 3:29 pm Post subject: 1GB or 512MB? |
|
|
Well with the computer i built, i have focused on getting the radeon 4870 1GB GPU for my computer, but now since ATI released those price cuts on the 512MB 4870, i wanna know if i should get the 512mb or the 1gb and the reason im asking is cause i want it to be as cheap as possible, and yes this is a gaming computer, the games i will mostly be playing are:Perfect World, Savage, Halo games, Mirror's Edge, Spore, Simcity 4, Simcity Societies, Age of Empires III, Warhammer 40,000, COD4,CODWAW, Maybe ill play crysis and crysis warhead until i beat the campaign, Gears Of War, Half Life 2,Half Life 3(when its out),Oblivion,Fallout 3,GTA4,FarCry 2, Stalker, Just Cause or Just Casue 2(i havent played number 2 so i cant tell which is better)
Also, i will play Oblivion, Spore, and Mirror's Edge the most. And yes my proccesor is good enough to support the 4870(my proccessor is the phenom II X4 940.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
&Vage Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 1053
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1G, Spore uses 400mb for my computer...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
countrycone Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 282
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
S3NS4 wrote: | 1G, Spore uses 400mb for my computer... | im talking about video card memory size not RAM
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zarr Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Posts: 915 Location: localhost
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
>1680 x 1050, get a 1GB card.
=< 1680 x 1050, get a 512MB card.
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
vmanisme Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 05 Sep 2007 Posts: 458 Location: Google!
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
if you dont have a massive monitor you dont need the 1GB, if you got like a 20> inch ur fine
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
superweapons Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 1355 Location: The Internet. Where else?
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GTA IV is a real video memory sucker. Even when you're running with the -availablevidmem command line trick, the overall performance of the game worsens over time. So I think it's worth it to get the 1GB model if you want to play the game at max settings-except for the view distance.
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
countrycone Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 282
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i have a 22 inch moniter, but i keep the resoulution at 1024 x 758, also i dont care about the view distance on GTA4 and as long as it plays, at high without lag, its okay
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Zarr Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Posts: 915 Location: localhost
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
countrycone wrote: | i have a 22 inch moniter, but i keep the resoulution at 1024 x 758, also i dont care about the view distance on GTA4 and as long as it plays, at high without lag, its okay |
What, why? That would look horrible. Completely defeats the point of having a 22" monitor. If you get a 4870, there's no excuse to not run it at it's native resolution.
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Luigi Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 1
Joined: 24 Mar 2008 Posts: 1082
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1g
The games will perform better.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
WiCk3DxT Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 03 Oct 2006 Posts: 344 Location: In a Nike SB store. :]
|
Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Zarr wrote: | countrycone wrote: | i have a 22 inch moniter, but i keep the resoulution at 1024 x 758, also i dont care about the view distance on GTA4 and as long as it plays, at high without lag, its okay |
What, why? That would look horrible. Completely defeats the point of having a 22" monitor. If you get a 4870, there's no excuse to not run it at it's native resolution. |
So true, I can't imagine myself running my 22 inch on 1024 x 758.
Since you are playing all those games you listed getting a 4870 will be your best bet and I don't think there is much money differentiation between the 512MB and the 1GB one anyways.
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Karakawe I post too much
Reputation: 3
Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 3899
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 1:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1024x758 is a waste. 1440x900 is at least in ratio to the monitor's recommended resolution.
Anyway, get a 512MB 4870. You don't need the extra memory.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
jamoaka007 Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 26 Feb 2008 Posts: 388
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Some of those games need alot of ram.
Be safe and get the 1gig
_________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
countrycone Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 282
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shuld i get the toxic edition of the sapphire 4870? its faster than the regualr 4870 1gb card and its cheaper.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cheetah I post too much
Reputation: 0
Joined: 11 Nov 2007 Posts: 2758
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
countrycone wrote: | i have a 22 inch moniter, but i keep the resoulution at 1024 x 758, also i dont care about the view distance on GTA4 and as long as it plays, at high without lag, its okay |
Oh god.
You ALWAYS run an LCD at it's native resolution, which on a 22" should be at least 1600x1050. NEVER run it any lower. LCD's look bad enough as it is, without having some shit scaler come into play.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
countrycone Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Posts: 282
|
Posted: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
im just wondering, is 550w power supply enough to power the 4870 1gb toxic edition video card?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|