| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Karakawe
I post too much
 Reputation: 3
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 3899
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 9:11 pm Post subject: Intel Core 2 Duo: 5.9 CPU WEI? |
 |
|
I know that quad-core CPUs are generally a 5.9 on the Windows Experience Index, and a number of AMD dual-cores are as well, but I haven't seen a C2D chip score a 5.9. An E8400 @ 3.6GHz doesn't, but some lower AMDs do. Any of you have a 5.9 with a Core 2 Duo? (This is only out of curiosity..)
EDIT:
Still 5.8 at 4GHz. >: |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sup3R C3r34L
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Posts: 1379
Location: Soviet Russia
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
you can't get a 5.9 with a c2d, I've never seen a AMD dual do it either tbh.
_________________
 It's sexy, amirite? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kls85
I post too much
 Reputation: 22
Joined: 18 Jul 2008
Posts: 2757
Location: Under ur bed
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
But over here it says you can get a 5.9 on a dual core
WinSAT scores |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sup3R C3r34L
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 05 Nov 2007
Posts: 1379
Location: Soviet Russia
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kls85 wrote: | But over here it says you can get a 5.9 on a dual core
WinSAT scores |
lulz, they also say amd have the best performing CPU...
also, if having a 5.9 is important to you, do this.
go to: C:\\windows\performance\winSAT\datastore and edit the newest one with wordpad.
(start from line 14)
_________________
It's sexy, amirite? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Karakawe
I post too much
Reputation: 3
Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 3899
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| sup3r wrote: | | kls85 wrote: | But over here it says you can get a 5.9 on a dual core
WinSAT scores |
lulz, they also say amd have the best performing CPU...
also, if having a 5.9 is important to you, do this.
go to: C:\\windows\performance\winSAT\datastore and edit the newest one with wordpad.
(start from line 14) |
I think that list is by recent activity, not actual performance. Sadly, I don't think it'll happen with a C2D, although there are a few dual-core C2Es on that list. I've got my E8400 @ 4.5GHz and nothing, so I guess it's a huge conspiracy. Thanks for the tip, but I'm not going to obsess over it. Was just wondering since some C2Es at much lower clocks and some poorer-performing AMDs were getting 5.9s. I'd be willing to say that it's by model, less the actual tests. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
