| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
chrono Expert Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 160
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:30 pm Post subject: Building a comp |
|
|
err guys, just wondering:
i'm in the process of building my own comp, and the only thing i need left are the processor and the OS [vital stuff!]
so like, the processor:first of all, i chose Intel b/c it won't overheat as much as AMD.
out of all the intel processors, which should i buy?
I considered a 2.66 ghz quad core processor for about 350$. Some ppl say it's a waste, and i heard from one guy that w/o a server, you can only use 2 cores out of the 4...
If i dont get a quad core, I'm stuck with the most powerful core 2 duo processor, which is about 3.66 ghz, 250$.
Also, for my OS, I'm not sure If i should buy XP Professional, or go with Linux. [I'm not going anywhere near vista...]
I heard ubuntu is very good, but i'm not sure what version to consider. [Ubuntu, Kubuntu, or Xubuntu?]
Either way, I need some opinions fast
thanks again guys!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Madman I post too much
Reputation: 1
Joined: 04 May 2006 Posts: 3978
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
First of all, Vista is great.
Second of all, go with a Q6600 as your processor.
Third of all, Go with Ubuntu if you want something legally free, Vista if you are cool.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chrono Expert Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 160
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| but is it true that if you have quad core and vista, you can only use 2 out of the 4 cores?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superweapons Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 1355 Location: The Internet. Where else?
|
Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 10:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not entirely. The program you're going to run has to support multi-threading (WinRAR decompression is a good example of multi-threading-if you enable it).
If you're getting a fast system (dual core, 2GB of RAM), then you should consider Vista. It's really good as long as you meet the recommended requirements.
You should get a quad core, more and more applications are being written to take advantage of multiple processing cores and threads. The Q6600 should suit most everyone's needs fine.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Madman I post too much
Reputation: 1
Joined: 04 May 2006 Posts: 3978
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 12:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
It also helps a lot when many programs are being run at the same time.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Konata Izumi Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 3
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Posts: 1527
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 11:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
and the q6600 is $180
_________________
CARCASSSSSSSSSSSSSSS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iTz SWAT I post too much
Reputation: 1
Joined: 20 Dec 2007 Posts: 2227 Location: Me.Location;
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Id go for:
OS:Vista Home Premium/Ultimate 32/64bit
CPU:Intel Q6600 2.4ghz/Q6700 2.66GHZ/ Q9450 2.66GHZ but L2 Cache and FSB is faster.
What that person saif about 2 and 4 cores isn't always true.
You Window's OS will use all 4 cores.
App's may use 2 or 4 cores.
The latest tech games will use quad core but earlier games may use 2.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SFP+ Comp. talk moderator
Reputation: 26
Joined: 02 May 2007 Posts: 1228 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Or you can choose q9300 as your CPU. It's slightly better than q6600. (At least it's more price-worthy over here in sweden)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gmimpact Newbie cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| q300, and linux if you're all for performance, and xp for doing old school stuff.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|